L'FBI ha rilasciato i file relativi ai processi subiti da Michael nel 1993-2005

Promemoria primo messaggio :

FBI files on Michael Jackson 'to be released'
Secret files on Michael Jackson are set to be released by the FBI, according to reports.
Despite an application under the US Freedom of Information Act, just over half of the file will remain confidential Photo: AP The FBI plans to declassify 333 pages of the late singer's file – the documents will reportedly include information about the child molestation investigations on Jackson in 1993 and 2004. It will not provide any new information on Jackson's sudden death in June aged 50 and the subsequent investigation.

The agency plans to make the papers available before Christmas at http://foia.fbi.gov, and may even release them today, according to celebrity website TMZ.com

Jackson toxicology report probe delays autopsy for a weekDespite an application under the US Freedom of Information Act, just over half of the file will remain confidential – Jackson's file is believed to be 679 pages altogether.

One particular incident thought to be included in the released files is when the owners of a private jet company allegedly attempted to sell a recording of Jackson. Two cameras were secretly installed in a plan taking Jackson to surrender to police on charges he molested a 12-year-old boy. Jackson was later acquitted of the charges.

fonte:telegraph

333 pagine del fascicolo dell'fbi relativi a Michael Jackson saranno resi pubblici prima di Natale.
i documenti conterranno pagine delle indagini su molestie a minori nel 1993 e nel 2004. Non fornirnno invece nuove informazioni sulla morte improvvisa di Jackson.
L'agenzia prevede di rendere disponibili i documenti prima di Natale su http://foia.fbi.gov, ma potrebbero essere anche rilasciati a tmz oggi.
La relazione tossicologica dell'autopsia nonostante le Freedom of Information Act degli Stati Uniti,restarà segreta per poco più della metà dei file che si crede contino in tutto 679 pagine.
Un particolare dettaglio potrebbe essere incluso nel file, ossia una registrazione fatta da due telecamere installate segretamente per riprendere Jackson davanti alla polizia.
Michael Jackson è stato assolto da tutte le accuse.
traduzione: childhood mjfa

lucy-RockYourWorld! ha scritto:questa del nome è l ennesima conferma per i believers!

anche se ne eravamo sicuri una conferma in più fa sempre comodo!!

moonwalker<3 ha scritto:grazie mille...l'ho appena sentito al telegiornale...volevo sprofondare...lo accusano di nuovo...mi sn stufata...sto per scoppiare...

Non lo stanno accusando di nuovo.L'FBI ha semplicemente pubblicato tuttii files relativi al tempo della accuse.Poi noi sappiam come si sono svolti i fatti dopo le accuse, e sappiamo che anche se la TV non lo dice, Chandler ha confessato.Ma indipendentemente da questo, non lo stanno riaccusando Se al tg hanno questo, sappi che sono c*****e.

chiedo scusa , non vorrei andare off topic , però quì mi sorge spontanea una domanda per i non believers ... questa storia del middlename "Joe" su documenti ufficiali rilasciati dall FBI non vi fà pensare che qualcosa non và? dato che tutti i documenti diciamo "post mortem" portano come secondo nome joseph ? forse è perchè michael joe jackson non è mai morto?

se sono off topic mi scuso in anticipo , però sarei curiosa di sentire i pareri dei non believers

Scusate posso chiedervi un favore?
Visto che non trovo i files sul sito dell FBI chi può postarli per favore?

childhood ha scritto:Michael é innocente!!!!

just because you read it in a magazine
or see it in the tv screen
don't make it factual, actual

Ti stra Childhood

childhood ha scritto:
si, non andiamo off topic please!!!!

pardon!

childhood ha scritto:95A-HQ-1.148.159: 30 ottobre 1995 al 24 gennaio 1997, 8 pagine

Questo file contiene i dettagli di una richiesta fatta all' FBI per analizzare una videocassetta VHS fornita dal US Customs Service come parte di un'indagine su filmati di pornografia infantile.

Io non ho capito questa parte?Qualcuno me la potrebbe spigare?

si dovrebbe controllare anche sul certificato di matrimonio...se non sbaglio quello con lisa marie è stato pubblicato....

mjj3 ha scritto:si dovrebbe controllare anche sul certificato di matrimonio...se non sbaglio quello con lisa marie è stato pubblicato....

Sul certificato di matrimonio di Michael e della Presley il nome risulta Michael JOSEPH Jackson!



Boh

Grazie!

Saturday, 2 January 2010
FBI File Reveals Attempt to Convict Jackson with Racist Law
Documents contained in Michael Jackson's FBI file show that the LAPD tried to prosecute the star under the same legislation used in the past to smear black luminaries such as Jack Johnson and Chuck Berry.

Records show that the LAPD contacted the FBI on 7th September 1993 to ask whether the bureau would assist in the prosecution of Michael Jackson under the Mann Act.


The Mann Act, also known as the 'White Slavery Act', was introduced in 1910. Allowing officers to make arrests on the vague premise of 'immoral behaviour', the law was frequently used to smear black men, particularly those who consorted with white women.

Jack Johnson, the world's first black Heavyweight Boxing Champion, was the first person to be prosecuted under the act. In fact, Geoffrey C Ward writes in his book 'Unforgivable Blackness' that the potential to smear Johnson had been one of the primary motivating factors behind the introduction of the law.

Johnson was viewed by the press and the establishment as a black man who didn't know his place. Not only was Johnson a black world champion more than 50 years before segregation was lifted, but he flaunted his success in a society which demanded that he be humble. He wore expensive clothes and jewellery and invested his money in a fleet of luxurious automobiles, a hobby for which he was repeatedly punished by white policemen who issued him with undeserved speeding tickets.

But what riled the establishment more than anything was that Johnson consorted with white women. Johnson was often accompanied on his travels by prostitutes, but so were the majority of his white contemporaries.

In 1913 Johnson was prosecuted under the Mann Act for 'transporting a female across the state line for immoral purposes'. None of his white contemporaries who also travelled with prostitutes were arrested or charged with similar crimes.

Johnson's alleged victims had travelled with him willingly and admitted it under oath. Moreover, the trips in question had taken place long before the Mann Act was even introduced. However, an all white jury convicted him regardless.

Years later the Mann Act was also used to sabotage the career of black musician Chuck Berry.

In 1959 Berry met a 14 year old waitress in El Paso and asked her to work as a hat-check girl in his restaurant. The girl agreed and he drove her from El Paso to St Louis on his way back from a concert.

On this flimsy premise Berry was arrested for 'transporting an underage girl for immoral purposes'. He was convicted under the Mann Act and sentenced to three years in prison.

In the same year Berry's white copycat Elvis Presley began openly dating Priscilla Beaulieu, a 14 year old girl. Furthermore, Scotty Moore's biography of Presley asserts that prior to his involvement with Beaulieu, the star had been dating an even younger girl.

Ergo, in 1913 the Mann Act was used to convict a black boxer whose only 'crime' was to indulge in the same behaviour as his white conemporaries. Later, In 1959, the Mann Act was used to prosecute a black musician for giving a job to an underage girl, while his white contemporary repeatedly slept with underage girls and went unpunished.

The Mann Act is an inherently r@#%$ law. Whilst it has not been used solely to prosecute African-Americans, the potential imprisonment of Jack Johnson was a primary motivating factor behind its introduction and since then it has been repeatedly used to convict black men of crimes that they didn't commit.

That Jackson was also targeted under the Mann Act is certainly intriguing and only strengthens the argument that he was targeted by a malicious prosecution on account of his race. In a way, it shows that little has changed since the days of Jack Johnson. The United States Attorney's decision not to prosecute Jackson under the Mann Act could be seen as a sign of progress, but the LAPD's decision to pursue Jackson in the first place - given the sheer abundance of evidence suggesting his innocence - remains disturbing.

That Jackson wasn't railroaded once he entered the courtroom is another indicator of progress. Of course, that the 2003 allegations against Jackson even made it into a courtroom was proof in itself that Jackson was given a bum rap - the allegations were nonsensical and his accusers were proven con artists - but while Johnson was found guilty of crimes that he patently did not commit, Jackson's jury at least made the right decision.

In Jackson's case it was only the media which tarred him as guilty.

Dai documenti pubblicati dall'FBI, emerge che il LAPD cercò di perseguire Michael con la stessa legislazione usata in passato contro altri personaggi di colore come Jack Johnson e Chuck Berry. Dal file emerge che il 7 settembre 1993 il LAPD contattò l'FBI per chiedere se potesse assisterlo nell'incriminazione di Michael Jackson sotto il Mann Act. Il Mann Act, conosciuto anche come il "White Slavery Act" fu introdotto nel 1910. Gli ufficiali potevano così arrestare anche sul vago concetto di 'comportamento immorale', la legge era usata frequentemente contro uomini di colore, particolarmente quelli che andavano con donne bianche.

fonte: http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.com/2010/01/fbi-file-reveals-attempt-to-convict.html / KOPD

Preferisco non rendere pubblico ciò che penso di Sneddon!!!
Quoto la canzone che Michael fece riferita a Lui (D.S.),so che alllo s*****o ha dato
molto fastidio!!!

[quote="Seipht"]

mjj3 ha scritto:si dovrebbe controllare anche sul certificato di matrimonio...se non sbaglio quello con lisa marie è stato pubblicato....

Sul certificato di matrimonio di Michael e della Presley il nome risulta Michael JOSEPH Jackson!



Boh [/quote
già,ma la csa trana è chesuquesto documetonon c'èl data,hoprovao nce ad ingradi ,maniete,non lotrovate strano?saràun fake?